General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

David Cameron.

Page 2 + 1 of 3

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

JoyBoroAngel

JoyBoroAngel Report 15 Aug 2011 17:50

my heart bleeds for that woman who might be evicted NOT
when her child who was her responsibility
never gave a monkeys flip flop
about the innocent people made homeless
by the mindless action of the rioters

TeresaW

TeresaW Report 15 Aug 2011 17:58

The mother is a well known community figure, working for community projects and charities, a churchgoer and the kind of example we think parents should be. She also as a 6 year old daughter.

Is it really fair that she is evicted? We dont' all know what our kids are up to, and it's easy for people so say they should, but it's not always possible...kids do lie to their parents,

This eviction trend, will not only exacerbate an existing problem but as there are children involved, the council has to BY LAW rehouse them. So is this just a PR exercise by the council. I think it is.

Rambling

Rambling Report 15 Aug 2011 18:02

Joy, he's 18, he's an adult ...it may be tempting to think of one's child as a child still at 18...but he's not, he's a grown man responsible for his own actions... his young sister is being evicted from her home...why? she's done nothing to deserve it surely..

Muffyxx

Muffyxx Report 15 Aug 2011 19:23

The conditions state that no one living at the property should ‘do anything which causes or is likely to cause a nuisance’ or commit ‘an arrestable offence’. It also points out that the family is £1,806.09 in arrears with their rent.

....read this earlier......

I guess they're legally within their rights to evict judging from the above.

I'm not set 100% on this issue one way or another btw...but I'm edging towards agreeing with it when I also read about her spurting bile about police brutality and lack of human rights for her little darling.

TeresaW

TeresaW Report 15 Aug 2011 19:32

It still doesn't address the problem though. The council still have to rehouse them BY LAW because of the 6 year old girl. They cannot legally make a minor homeless, no matter what the reason.

It is also the same council that has to rehouse them, so in all, it achieves nothing, it's just political posturing, nothing more. There are plenty of convicted criminals under the same council who have not been evicted.

I can't comment on the tenancy agreement, as I haven't seen it, but many councils (and private landlords) do have somethng similar. If they were going to act on that agreement, then councils should have made it a normal course of action long ago, not suddenly bring it into force now.

I'm sorry, but I see this as a kneejerk reaction, and does nothing to solve the problem. It won't help to make people homeless, it will give the thugs another excuse.

Muffyxx

Muffyxx Report 15 Aug 2011 19:36

Yeah most likely...but it all comes down to the rights with responsiblities issue again.

She'd shout from the rooftops if the Council failed to keep to their side of the contract......works both ways.

As i say...not convinced one way or another on this...but her attitude hasn't helped my stance.

JoyBoroAngel

JoyBoroAngel Report 15 Aug 2011 19:46

well why dont they just give the mother a choice
he goes or they all go after all he lives under her roof
and why does she owe £1806.09 rent arrears
right figure of the comunity she is

maybe it will make him think before he acts next time

sorry but my sympathys with the vicims
i am on a anti social behaviour focus group run by the local housing ascosiation and if a tenent has been evicted through anti social behavior
or the ASB of somebody living at the address
they do not have to rehouse them

Rambling

Rambling Report 15 Aug 2011 20:07

I think at the moment lots of people are in debt on their rent or mortgage...decent people who have had a good wage and lost it... so while that's regrettable there may be circumstances which mitigate having that debt..I don't know in this case what those reasons 'could' be.

I would expect he will be convicted and in prison, rather than living with his mother where ever she is , so don't see the point in moving her out?



TeresaW

TeresaW Report 15 Aug 2011 20:50

My sympathy is also with the victims Joy, always, but does moving the problem to another place sort the problem out? It's the same as those happy to evict the travellers because they don't want it on their doorsteps, it's only moving the problem on to someone else's doorstep, then they move them on and a vicious cycle begins, while the problem is still there.

I will also say, I will admit I haven't seen anything about the mother being in arrears with her rent, but plenty of reports on the kind of person she actually is, which is pretty much the kind of model parent and member of the community we are all asking these people to be.

Yes it can be argued that the 18 year old should have thought of his family first, and that goes without saying, but there is still a 6 year old involved in this, and eviction will only serve to destabilise her life. Does she deserve that? Does she really deserve to be made to take the punishment for her brother's crimes?

If the mother is in arrears with her rent, then I can only sympathise. Please don't assume that if someone is in arrears it's because they can't be bothered to pay. Money is in short supply, and housing is damn expensive in that area. Housing benefit, IF she was in receipt of it, does NOT cover the whole rent, in spite of what others may think. Lots of people are losing their homes during this recession, for a multitude of reasons. I have every sympathy with someone who is clearly struggling to keep a roof over their head.

Sorry, but I cannot take the hard line and just endorse throwing a 6 year old out of their home, probably breaking up her family, her school life, taking her away from her friends and so on. It's not right, and won't serve any purpose.

Muffyxx

Muffyxx Report 15 Aug 2011 21:22

Just musing out loud.......

BUT if this lad was aware that his actions could've lost his mother and his sister as well as him their home...would he have been less likely to loot/riot? Instead of thinking he had nothing so no one could touch him as he had nothing to lose? Or that there would be no consequences to his behaviour?...or whatever the hell it was that was going through his head when he walked into that shop? x

Muffyxx

Muffyxx Report 15 Aug 2011 22:02

The more I think about it..the more i think that knowing the consequences are so harsh WOULD make the majority think twice before doing it again.

JoyBoroAngel

JoyBoroAngel Report 15 Aug 2011 22:12

just seen the news
and labour think thy have all the answers pmsl twice
shame they didnt sort it when they were in power


funny as its their fault things are this bad