General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

LATEST CHARLES: ' We have no compassion' he moans!

Page 0 + 1 of 3

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Macbev

Macbev Report 28 Feb 2005 15:59

Is THAT why he has invited himself to my home town? I thought the Brits had stopped sending their unwanted to Oz! Beverley in sunny Perth

Unknown

Unknown Report 28 Feb 2005 15:51

Good Lord! If Prince Charles, with all his privileges and wealth, is fed up with being told what to do, how does he think the rest of us feel in Blairy-fairyland?!!! If Camilla is so important to him, why doesn't he put their happiness first and give up public life, if he finds it all so painful. He ought to realise nobody - but NOBODY - can have everything in life! Silly man! CB >|<

Jody

Jody Report 28 Feb 2005 15:49

I would hate to think that Diana is forgotten about, regardless of stories and slander, she appeared to bring a lot of happiness to a lot of people. Charles and Camilla however are just 'Royals', stuck up and Autocratic we do as they say not as they do. I would like to let Diana rest in peace, but i get this niggling feeling that all this was planned! No one seems to be addressing that anymore. I hope they get eggs thrown at them on their wedding day, and as for William i was hoping he would carry on with a part of his mother in him, that seems to be long gone. As for Harry i suppose time will tell. So my answer is Charles is correct i have no compassion for him and never will. Maybe when he shows a bit of compassion for animals he may learn to show compassion towards human beings!

Jennifer

Jennifer Report 28 Feb 2005 15:42

he he he I'm standing in the corner now, getting quite crowded here jennifer.

Harry

Harry Report 28 Feb 2005 15:40

Marian, Let,s have a little bit of fairness. You are entitled to your opinion on Prince Charles. The statement was, ' The British people are supposed to be compassionate. I don,t see much evidence of it' , he snapped back to a reporter. The remark was made in 1998 , SEVEN years ago. With the press he often gets, I would argue that he has a point. Happy days.

bridan

bridan Report 28 Feb 2005 15:20

A man lacking morals and compassion is hardly in a position to complain about the British (alleged) lack of compassion. He says this because we are not prepared to be out there waving flags on the occasion of his taking a step he was not man enough to take years ago. It was revealed that Britain donated a fantastic £300 million to the tsunami appeal- proving that British compassion is alive and well. Bridget x

Lily

Lily Report 28 Feb 2005 08:34

Cynical, I know, but do you think that Tony and his cronies thought a Royal Wedding would give us a feel-good factor to take us thro' the election and make us vote for the LP? Judging from all the messages on here, not many are thinking of C & C and their nuptials thro' rose-coloured specs! I have always thought that having a Queen instead of a Dictator was preferable, but her disfunctional family are hardly her ideal backing group!! Dilys

MrsBucketBouquet

MrsBucketBouquet Report 28 Feb 2005 00:43

Lyla Your very NORTY!.....but I like it lol Go do 100 lines and stand in the corner.....(I'll join you ina min) Gerri ;o)

MrsBucketBouquet

MrsBucketBouquet Report 28 Feb 2005 00:35

Christine They move the goal posts as they see fit! I wont be watching the telly the day those two caniving little so n so's get wed! They are well suited to each other. I say, If they want to wed....they should sod orf up to Scotland and do it.....BUT....give up all rights to the crown 1st. She will NEVER be Queen in this house!!!!! I have 7 grandkids.............. THIS COUNTRYS FUTURE... Nanny Gerri

Christine

Christine Report 28 Feb 2005 00:02

Pardon me if I'm wrong but Edward V111 had to abdicate to marry a divorcee - what's changed since then?

Denise

Denise Report 27 Feb 2005 23:53

A young couple in the area I live are marrying at the same place straight after charles and camilla,the only difference is she will have all her family there mother and all.Denise.

Unknown

Unknown Report 27 Feb 2005 18:53

I'm not sure it is legal to keep the public out. Don't the doors have to stay open - presumably so someone can object if they think there is an impediment to the marriage? nell

Haribo

Haribo Report 27 Feb 2005 18:14

No i haven't seen this Linda, but it is common knowledge that Diana was very much aware of Camilla's prescence in the Abbey on her wedding day.

Haribo

Haribo Report 27 Feb 2005 18:07

All i can say is 'what goes around, comes around '

Guinevere

Guinevere Report 27 Feb 2005 18:03

I have no problem with him marrying Camilla, good luck to them both. I was never a fan of his first wife. But I resent the money it will cost us. I resent every penny of my taxes that goes to this family. We don't need them - this is the 21st century. Let them start spending their own cash on housing and transport. If Andrew wants to travel by plane/helicopter to play golf then he should buy his own. Gwynne

Maid Marian of

Maid Marian of Report 27 Feb 2005 18:00

Thanks for your views

Glenys the Menace!

Glenys the Menace! Report 27 Feb 2005 18:00

Thinking about it, I agree with Sarah about going forward, etc. It might help if he acknowledged that he appeared not to show much - if any - compassion to Diana. He must acknowledge that he and his bit on the side (for that is what she was when Diana was alive) were in the wrong. OK, so Diana wasn't a saint, but she didn't deserve that.

Claire in Lincs

Claire in Lincs Report 27 Feb 2005 17:57

I think what he means is,,,we should all agree with him and Camilla getting hitched and we should be overjoyed about it.. Well i dont give a toss,

Marlene

Marlene Report 27 Feb 2005 17:57

I know I havn't. If he loves her as he say's he does, give up the throne like his uncle did.

Slinky

Slinky Report 27 Feb 2005 17:55

I can't really be bothered with any of them...the Royals are from a family of mixed blood anyway, Germans , Greeks, French...you name it they got it. If you go back through the ages there was a lot of usurping and murders to get the throne of England....I was once told that the true heir to the throne lives in Australia and is an ordinary married man with a family....wouldn't surprise me either!!! Long live King Bruce the Sheep Farmer...lol Anne. xx