General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Daily Mail today - Princess Margaret's secret son!
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Suzy | Report | 9 Mar 2005 10:59 |
|
Why would the Queen Mother have had a pregnancy test when her husband died? - she was 51 years old. Do you mean when Edward VIII abdicated in 1936, when Princess Elizabeth became heir to the throne on her Father's coronation? |
|||
|
Deanna | Report | 9 Mar 2005 10:27 |
|
I saw him on the telly the other morning. I thought the way they interviewed him was abit aggressive, he was a very gentle man and, was not saying anything he should'nt. He was merely asking for questions to be answered. Some hope....poor fella' Deanna |
|||
|
Scrummy | Report | 9 Mar 2005 09:11 |
|
Bill - could your parentage be anything to do with the fact you live in OZ, not sent to the Tower but to the 'Colonies' !! :)) brenda |
|||
|
Joyce | Report | 9 Mar 2005 08:05 |
|
with reference to Bill's message 'Queen Mother and pregnancy '..When I was in Canada 9 years ago I bought the book written by Kitty Kelly which is banned in this country . There is a section in it which refers to the Queen's pregnancies , artificial insemination ..... Needeless to say I left the book in Canada..didn't want to be sent to the Tower !!! Joyce , |
|||
|
Deb Vancouver (18665) | Report | 9 Mar 2005 02:45 |
|
Hi Bill, thanks for the explanation re: 2037. If what your Grandfather told you is true, and I have no reason to think otherwise, what a shake down the monarchy is in for!!! With the way the scientific field is going, maybe your Grandfathers facts will be proven long before then. Who would have guessed 15 years ago that DNA data, obtained through a simple mouth swab, would change the course of history for many people? With your Grandfather being the cousin of the late Queen Mother, what relationship would that make you to the present Monarch? By the way, when 'box 24' is released I will be a very old lady (hopefully) and will either state 'I knew that years ago' or I will be too old to really care! Fascinating though. Deb |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 9 Mar 2005 02:41 |
|
The Prince who had fits was Prince John. He was the youngest son of George 5th and Queen Mary. There was a TV drama a couple of years ago about him. I think it was called The Lost Prince. Margaret |
|||
|
Sue Lambrini Smith | Report | 9 Mar 2005 01:34 |
|
bill- me thinks you know much more than you are letting on !!! and didnt the one with the curly hair [ and sailor suit] die young ! and was hidden away because he had fits ! |
|||
|
Deb Vancouver (18665) | Report | 9 Mar 2005 00:52 |
|
Blonde moment here - Why the year 2037? Deb |
|||
|
ChrisofWessex | Report | 8 Mar 2005 22:47 |
|
Not everyone conceives quickly - my parents were married 6 years before I graced their life and it was 5 years later before my brother joined me. Our young neighbour is now expecting her second baby after a seven year gap. Ann |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:58 |
|
You surely don't believe that 'The Powers That Be' will ever find it necessary to tell the truth to us peasants. |
|||
|
Sue Lambrini Smith | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:56 |
|
bill- what truth could come out in 2037 ? surely whatever happened it will stay a 'secret' within the royal family ? there have always been rumours about the parentage of diana's youngest, but i doubt any truths will ever come out. |
|||
|
Ginny | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:51 |
|
Yes tis I ! |
|||
|
sandra rogers | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:49 |
|
hiya ginny is my memory correct in saying you was on chat a while back talking about your clematis |
|||
|
Debbie | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:49 |
|
I wonder if there is any looking in. as Princess Margarets name is on this site. You never know the Queen must have some time at home doing bits and pieces. |
|||
|
Hawthorn | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:47 |
|
I wonder if the Royal Family are reading this! |
|||
|
Ginny | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:45 |
|
presumably they would have had to wait for the child to be born - if a boy then it would be King - a girl - another good time princess ! |
|||
|
Ginny | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:41 |
|
interesting fact - apparently when George VI died there was a delay in declaring Elizabeth queen as a pregnancy test had to be done on the Queen mum. If she had been pregnant and it had been a boy............ |
|||
|
Abigail | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:35 |
|
Has he gone to bed or something if he is in OZ? Oh BIiiiLLLLL! Abigail |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:34 |
|
nudge, where's Bill.? |
|||
|
Abigail | Report | 8 Mar 2005 21:32 |
|
WHERE IS BILL? Abigail |
|||