Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ancestry BMD query
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Meduck | Report | 14 Feb 2006 21:13 |
Me again, I've just read the replies again, and just picked up on Elaines answer from Spain. If George says he's still married in 1891 and a widower in 1901, then Ellen must still be around in 1881 but the family have definitely split up. The plot thickens, pity I don't know her maiden name |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 21:11 |
Jennifer No, divorce was unlikely. But if you haven't found a death, its possible that she and her husband split up and possibly went through a bigamous marriage. Does her husband say he is widowed or appear on another census with a different 'wife'? nell |
|||
|
Meduck | Report | 14 Feb 2006 21:04 |
Wow!. Thanks for all your replies, you're all right on my family tree. I'm still very new to all this and feeling my way around but I'm sure you're right on the birth and death being in 1871, I don't know how I missed it although my eyes were going around in circles staring at the screen all that time. Not sure whats happened to Ellen Kidger, she was only 38 in 1871 and only assuming she died as they didn't really divorce then did they |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:31 |
appaerently the bdm is only just over 50% complete but the bdm beta images is supposed to be complete, i have been looking for a marraige for 9 months and to no avail but now the beta is on ancestry i have managed to find the marriage. Debra (davids sister) |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:27 |
This might be the clincher: All 1871 England Census Results You have saved this record to My Ancestry (Shoebox). You have saved this record to My Ancestry (People I'm Looking For). Close About this database This database contains an every name index to the 1871 England Census with links to images of the original census returns. Information available in this database includes: name, age, estimated birth year, relationship to head of household, More information below 1871 England Census Record about Ammay Kidger Name: Ammay Kidger Age: 3 months Estimated birth year: abt 1871 Relation: Daughter Where born: Middlesborough, Yorkshire, England Civil Parish: Linthorpe County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Source information: RG10/4896 Folio: 17 Page: 27 ***********Registration district: *****Stockton ************ Sub-registration district: Yarm |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:25 |
But if this is yours, then you were right: Kidger, Amy Record Type: Deaths Age at death: 0 Quarter: September Year: 1871 District: Stockton Volume: 10a Page: 29 nell |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:23 |
1871 has Ammay's age as 3 months so chances are her birth would be registered in first quarter of 1871: Kidger, Amy Record Type: Births Quarter: March Year: 1871 District: Stockton Volume: 10a Page: 67 I believe Stockton is next door to Middlesbrough on the map. nell |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:18 |
On 1891 George listed as married George Kidger abt 1829 Thorpe Acre, Leicestershire, England Lodger 5 Regent Street, Loughborough, Leicestershire, England and in 1901 listed as widower George Kidger abt 1831 Thorpe, Leicestershire, England Pauper Shardlow Derbyshire |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:15 |
1871 for reference Ammay Kidger abt 1871 Middlesborough, Yorkshire, England Daughter Linthorpe Yorkshire Charles Kidger abt 1856 Staveley, Derbyshire, England Son Linthorpe Yorkshire Ellen Kidger abt 1833 Thrussington, Leicestershire, England Wife Linthorpe Yorkshire Ellen Kidger abt 1866 Crow Hedge, Yorkshire, England Daughter Linthorpe Yorkshire Frederick Kidger abt 1865 Crow Hedge, Yorkshire, England Son Linthorpe Yorkshire George Kidger abt 1829 Thorpe Acre, Leicestershire, England Head Linthorpe Yorkshire Henry Kidger abt 1853 Thorp Acre, Leicestershire, England Son Linthorpe Yorkshire Mary Lest abt 1856 Leeds, Yorkshire, England Servant Linthorpe Yorkshire |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:15 |
1871 for reference Linthorpe Yorkshire George Kidger abt 1829 Thorpe Acre, Leics Head Ellen Kidger abt 1833 Thrussington, Leicestershire, Wife Henry Kidger abt 1853 Thorp Acre, Leicestershire, Son Charles Kidger abt 1856 Staveley, Derbyshire, Son Frederick Kidger abt 1865 Crow Hedge, Yorkshire, Son Ellen Kidger abt 1866 Crow Hedge, Yorkshire, Daughter Ammay Kidger abt 1871 Middlesborough, Yorks Daughter Mary Lest abt 1856 Leeds, Yorkshire, England Servant |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:12 |
I have a relative who appears in a census under her maiden surname after her husband died, but whose death was registered under her married name. All sorts of reasons why this stuff happens...! |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:11 |
Original image of 1871 looks more like Anmay - perhaps Ann May? nell |
|||
|
Teaky | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:09 |
I know this sounds silly but was kidger her married name or her maiden name. I was really stupid once and spent months looking for my great grandmother's death certificate under her maiden name until it dawned on me she died under her married name!!! DOH!!!! I'm sure you're not as daft as me but just in case!! |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:09 |
I was going to say - if someone disappears from a census 9 times out of 10 its because they've changed their name (got married, etc) or been mistranscribed. I don't believe Ammay was called Ammay either - have you looked for Amy? and Kidger could easily be rendered Kedger, Ridger, Bidger etc. nell |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:07 |
Always beware of that word 'obviously'! Perhaps they're living in a completely different part of the country? |
|||
|
Meduck | Report | 14 Feb 2006 16:02 |
Has anyone any idea whether the BMD on Ancestry is complete. I've got a gr. gr grandmother called Ellen Kidger and daughter Ammay(?) shown on the 1871 census but they've both disappeared on the 1881 census. They've both obviously died as the rest of the family appear, albeit split up. I've trawled through every death from 1871 to 1881 and apart from feeling dizzy I've got nowhere. |