General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Will one please do me a looky up 1851..
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:18 |
|
Well it said she was single not widowed so I think she was a trollop lol. |
|||
|
Silly Sausage | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:18 |
|
Susan another dressmaker single age 20 with a 6yr daughter...in my display FT...** decides no way can they be related.....** |
|||
|
Susan719813 | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:16 |
|
trouble is...there is also this one n 1871 |
|||
|
Silly Sausage | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:12 |
|
We decided Mary Bamber was either widowed or a trollop.....as the youngest son John wilde Bamber... |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:10 |
|
Hayley, I thought we had sorted the Bamber thing out but can't remember what we agreed now lol. |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:09 |
|
lmao, well I was following it last time but am pretty lost now. I'm blaming it on my bonds.... still no James Bond btw lol |
|||
|
Silly Sausage | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:09 |
|
That is the correct parish with James abt 1828..... |
|||
|
Susan719813 | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:08 |
|
is this him 1871...tis North Street too |
|||
|
Silly Sausage | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:07 |
|
Liz you Sue and Claire must be getting to know this better that me.. |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:05 |
|
This may be the 1841 James & Mary |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:04 |
|
If it fits with what you know from other sources then I would go with it. |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:03 |
|
lmao Hayley, sometimes it just gets that way doesn't it? |
|||
|
Silly Sausage | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:03 |
|
but that would knock soooooooooo many walls down...I think I have just got to admit it I am stuck... |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:02 |
|
ok...there are a 118 Wildes on 1841 in ashton... blinky eck they were populating the town lol. |
|||
|
Silly Sausage | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:01 |
|
talk about make it up..... |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 20 Feb 2008 00:00 |
|
James Wilde abt 1835 Lancashire, England Ashton Under Lyne, Lancashire |
|||
|
Susan719813 | Report | 19 Feb 2008 23:58 |
|
If you are missing an Ann Wilde age 20, dressmaker, in the 1841 census....she is in Moss street of the same village with a daughter Ann age 6 ( presumably ) where born has S beside both of them..( scotland?).also an Hannah Ncholson with her age 1/7 born Lancashire |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 19 Feb 2008 23:58 |
|
Should we just give you all the wilde's in ashton and let you figure it out later? lol. |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 19 Feb 2008 23:57 |
|
No relationships stated on the 1841 Hayley |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 19 Feb 2008 23:57 |
|
I'd say son of but being 41 doesn't say... blinky pains they were. |
|||