Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
anyone else having probs with ancestry 1871 census
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
karenandjim | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:21 |
|
just a quickie to see if anyone else is having probs with ancestry 1871 census, when i put names in its throwing up different surnames jim |
|||
|
Esta | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:23 |
|
James - you are not alone - it's doing some very strange things tonight !!! Esta |
|||
|
Nantwich | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:24 |
|
Hi Jim Me too!! am already tired but thats giving me a headache!!! maybe we might find lost rellies on the Ancestry 1871 lottery!!!! Sarah |
|||
|
Tiamo | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:25 |
|
Seems to have settled down, now. Famous last words! |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:29 |
|
Ancestry as a whole has gone weird on me. Typed in the surname IRLAM for 1871 and got results for Jewett. And 1891 England has disappeared altogether for me! Lou |
|||
|
karenandjim | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:31 |
|
ah ha 1871 appears to have got over the gremlins, i'll give 1891 a try lou |
|||
|
karenandjim | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:34 |
|
1891 working for me loudolph if you need anything off there i'd be happy to check for you |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:50 |
|
very weird for me too. finds different names to ones typed in for searh and when you click on to view others in the household you get no one who is even connected.. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:57 |
|
I've had the same thing too. Tried to contact Ancestry by email to inform them and that went all weird on me too and wouldn't send. Then when I tried searching on the same name again it worked fine. Just trying to send us all mad I think!!! Kath. x |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:57 |
|
Thanks James I still have no 1891 access! I don't need the actual image cos I have them all printed off at home BUT I'm living elsewhere at moment so not to hand! I need the address and who is living there, especially if they have a little girl with them, be about 3 or 4 called Emma. PROBLEM is that this chap of mine changes his surname more often that my son has clean nappies. SO he's born Lancashire 1845 George and wife Emma...could either be Gladrey, Gladerry, Gladsey, Gladney, Glathery or Glathers. If its a hassle, it doesn't matter! Cheers Lou |
|||
|
karenandjim | Report | 30 Dec 2004 23:59 |
|
no probs loudolph but as captain oats is rumoured to have said, i maybe gone a while jim |
|||
|
karenandjim | Report | 31 Dec 2004 00:09 |
|
hi loudolph i believe i've found him under the name of Gladerry born in Ireland Living at 8 brook street Ashton Under Lyne Lancashire George Gladerry 46 head Gen Lab emma 45 wife John 22 son Joseph 18 son annie 16 daughter emma 3 ( could be 13 ) daughter hope these are the right ones loudolph jim |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 31 Dec 2004 00:14 |
|
James Fan-pooting-tastic, that's them! Another brickwall about to come crashing down with the discovery of little Emma! Thank you so much Lou |
|||
|
karenandjim | Report | 31 Dec 2004 00:17 |
|
fandabbydozy loudolph glad to have helped jim |
|||
|
Paula | Report | 31 Dec 2004 09:09 |
|
I can't get the 1891 census this morning if i go through the standard name search on the home page but if i click on 1891 census at the bottom of the page i seem to be able to search the census on its own ok Paula |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 31 Dec 2004 11:10 |
|
Paula I'll give that a try then. Couldn't access it either way last night. I even tried searching for anyone called George in Lancashire in 1891 and it was telling me there were no records. As if!!! Lou |
|||