Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Which Registration District?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Lynne | Report | 29 Jul 2005 11:52 |
I have found 2 possible births for Samuel Moore, according to 1901 census, born Castle Eden. One is registered in Gateshead and the other in Stockton. Does anyone know which would be most likely please? Thanks in advance. Lynne |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 29 Jul 2005 11:57 |
Different spelling? Castle Edon DUR Easington |
|||
|
Lynne | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:02 |
Jim Sorry, Castle Eden is in Durham but what is Easington please? Lynne |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:09 |
It is a registration district, so if Edon and Eden are same place the two births you found are incorrect. Easington Created 1st July 1837. Sub-district : Dawdon; Easington; Wingate. GRO volumes : XXIV (1837-51); 10a (1852-1930). Burdott, Castle Edon, Cold Hesledon, Dalton le Dale, Dawdon, Easington, East Murton, Haswell, Hawthorn, Hutton Henry, Kelloe, Monk Hesleden, Nesbitt, Seaham, Seaton with Slingley, Sheraton with Hulam, Shotton, Thornley, Wingate. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:14 |
From www.fhsc.org.uk/genuki/REG/index.htm, here's Genuki's guide to registration districts: Gateshead Created 1st July 1837. Sub-districts : Gateshead; Heworth; Whickham; Winlaton. GRO volumes : XXIV (1837-51); 10a (1852-1930). Chopwell, Crawcrook, Gateshead, Heworth with Felling, Heworth Within, Ryton, Ryton Woodside, Stella, Whickham, Winlaton. Registers now in Gateshead district. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Stockton Created 1st July 1837. Mainly in Durham, but included parts of Yorkshire North Riding. Sub-districts : Hartlepool; Sedgefield; Stockton; Yarm. GRO volumes : XXIV (1837-51); 10a (1852-1930). Aislaby (1837-75), Billingham (1837-75), Bishop Middleham (1837-96), Bishopton (1837-96), Bradbury (1837-96), Brierton (1837-59), Butterwick and Oldacres (1837-96), Carlton, Chilton (1837-96), Claxton (1837-59), Cornforth (1837-96), Cowpen Bewley (1837-75), Dalton Piercy (1837-59), East and West Newbiggin (1837-96), East Hartburn, Egglescliffe (1837-75), Elstob (1837-96), Elton, Elwick (1837-59), Elwick Hall (1837-59), Embleton (1837-96), Ferryhill (1837-96), Fishburn (1837-96), Foxton (1837-96), Garmondsway Moor (1837-96), Greatham (1837-59), Great Stainton (1837-96), Grindon, Hart (1837-59), Hartlepool (1837-59), Little Stainton (1837-96), Long Newton, Low Spennymoor (1837-96), Mainsforth (1837-96), Middleton (1837-59), Mordon (1837-96), Newsham (1837-75), Newton Bewley, Norton, Preston le Skerne (1837-96), Preston on Tees, Redmarshall, Seaton (1837-59), Seaton Carew (1837-59), Sedgefield (1837-96), Shotton (1837-96), Stillington (1837-96), Stockton on Tees, Stranton (1837-56), Thorpe Bulmer (1837-59), Thrislington (1837-96), Throston (1837-59), Trimdon (1837-96), West Hartlepool (1837-59), Whitton, Wolviston (1837-75), Woodham (1837-99). Registers now divided between Stockton on Tees, Redcar & Cleveland, Hartlepool, Durham Northern, Darlington, Durham Central and North Yorkshire districts. and this is the one referred to above: Sub-district : Dawdon; Easington; Wingate. GRO volumes : XXIV (1837-51); 10a (1852-1930). Burdott, Castle Edon, Cold Hesledon, Dalton le Dale, Dawdon, Easington, East Murton, Haswell, Hawthorn, Hutton Henry, Kelloe, Monk Hesleden, Nesbitt, Seaham, Seaton with Slingley, Sheraton with Hulam, Shotton, Thornley, Wingate. Registers now divided between Durham Eastern, Durham Central and Sunderland districts. On www streetmap uk co, Castle EdEn is some miles south of Easington, so this looks like the right area. Nell |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:19 |
This looks like him in 1881. Address might give a clue to district. Samuel Moore abt 1878 Castle Eden, Durham, England Son 13 Fir St, Hedworth Monkton & Jarrow, Durham, England |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:21 |
Castle Eden is definitely spelt with an 'e', and would have been in Durham. I think you need to find a birth in the Easington registration district. Kath. x |
|||
|
Lynne | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:25 |
Thanks Jim, Helen and Kathleen for that very useful information. Jim, yes that is him in 1881. So to conclude, the Stockton one is most likely then? Lynne |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:26 |
I don't think we are disputing that Castle Eden is in Durham. But I am saying that on the map it is nearer Easington than Stockton, and therefore as Genuki has it (albeit with a spelling error) in Easington Reg. district. Nell |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:27 |
Lynne, Just updated my reply. Think you need Easington district. Kath. x |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Jul 2005 12:38 |
I'm not sure that you have to register a birth where it occurred. I suppose in the 1800's people usually did, but I know from my own grandson that he was born Cottingham which should be Sculcoates district, and they lived Market Weighton which should be Pocklington district, but his birth was actually registered in Beverley, as I was there at the time. Kath. x |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 29 Jul 2005 13:58 |
Also, just because he said he was born in Castle Eden on the census, doesn't mean he actually was born there! Some of my lot changed their birthplace details on every census, and I'm sure that some of them had no idea where they were born so just guessed. Families that moved around a lot and had lots of kids didn't seem to remember which kids they had in which place either! If you know the parents names, you could order either of the 2 certs with the parents name(s) as checking points - that way its only £3 wasted if incorrect! |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 29 Jul 2005 14:04 |
Kathleen All events - births, marriages and deaths - have to be registered in the area where the event occurred. However, you can provide the information at any register office - my birth was informed 'by declaration' in Horley though I was born elsewhere. From ONS website: 'Whether or not there is provision for registering at the hospital, you can go to any register office – though things will take a day or two longer if you go to one which does not cover the district in which the baby was born. This is because the registrar will need to forward your information to the district where the birth took place in order for the registration to take place – and it is from here that the birth certificate will be sent to you. Register office opening hours vary from one district to another and most operate an appointment system.' |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Jul 2005 14:16 |
Thanks Nell - you learn something every day. I did think it strange that we went to Beverley to register my grandson. However in the indexes the registration district IS given as Beverley which is where we went. Kath. x |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 29 Jul 2005 14:47 |
Lynne Did you get the two birth references from FREEBMD? if so the records are incomplete. Ask for a lookup from 1837 online. |
|||
|
Lynne | Report | 29 Jul 2005 15:24 |
Hi everyone Only just come back to this thread and seen all your replies. I will have another look for a birth registered in the Easington district and see what I can come up with. Jim I did get them from FreeBMD but I do have a few credits for 1837 so will have a look for myself. Thank you all for your input. Lynne |